Frodo Failed
I thought this image was funny.
By the way, as Ryan Cox points out:
Rumsfeld is now saying that the lack of weapons is
suspicous (see article).
He also claims that the US doesn't need to prove anything, Iraq has to prove
that they have abandoned them. This is sort of like the cops telling you that
they'll arrest you unless you are able to prove that didn't murder anyone.
Apparently two months of violation-free inspections doesn't help Iraq's
case.
This makes no sense to me. Guilty until proven innocent? That's not how we think of trials here in America. If Rumsfeld claims
to have evidence of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, he sure isn't
sharing it with the American public or the UN. And so Rumsfeld's recent
statement is absurd. The burden of proof is on him. Right?
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home